Legal Expert Specialized in Drug Cases and State Security

Engaging a legal expert specialized in drug cases has become an urgent necessity given the strictness with which the Jordanian legislator deals with narcotics and psychotropic substance crimes, in order to ensure the protection of rights and the preservation of freedoms. Cases heard before the State Security Court in Jordan require precise knowledge of the provisions of the Narcotics Law No. 11 of 2016, since procedural loopholes related to arrest and search reports play a decisive role in the course of the case. The task of the legal expert is not limited to presenting the defense alone, but extends to scrutinizing the legal characterization of the offense—whether it is promotion/trafficking, use, or possession—and ensuring that the accused benefits from the discretionary mitigating reasons made available by the law, particularly in cases of first-time use. A deep understanding of Jordanian criminal policy and the investigative procedures and trials that follow it is what gives the client the strongest legal position to ensure that justice takes its proper course.

Legal Expert Specialized in Drug Cases and State Security

Engaging a legal expert specialized in drug cases and state security in Jordan is an urgent necessity dictated by the particular nature of the Jordanian judicial system, since most of these cases are referred to the State Security Court as a judicial body with sensitive specialized jurisdiction. The importance of this specialization lies in the ability to precisely distinguish between drug use—where the law may grant a first chance for rehabilitation and exemption from punishment under certain conditions—and promotion/trafficking, where penalties escalate up to life hard labor.

A deep understanding of the Jordanian Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Law and its recent amendments enables the specialist to monitor the validity of the search and arrest procedures issued by the Anti-Narcotics Department, and to ensure their conformity with the legal principles set out in the Code of Criminal Procedure. This constitutes the first line of defense for protecting the constitutional rights and freedoms of clients before both the military and civil judiciary alike.

Jurisdiction of the State Security Court over Narcotics Cases

The State Security Court in Jordan enjoys exclusive, specialized jurisdiction over narcotics offenses under its own law and the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Law. Its most prominent jurisdictions are summarized as follows:

It has jurisdiction over cases of trafficking, importing, exporting, and cultivation of narcotic substances with intent to trade.
The Court gives special attention to cases involving the promotion of narcotics and psychotropic substances due to the danger they pose to societal security.
It hears organized crimes committed by international gangs smuggling drugs across Jordanian borders.
Its jurisdiction extends to include anyone who participated, incited, or intervened in the commission of any of the aforementioned crimes.
It hears financial crimes connected to the proceeds of illicit drug trafficking.

The Difference Between Promotion/Trafficking and Simple Possession under Article 15 of the Law

Jordanian law distinguishes between the two based on criminal intent and the purpose for which the substance is possessed:

1. Promotion/Trafficking – Article 15/A

The Act: distributing narcotic substances or transferring them to others, whether for material consideration or free of charge.
The Penalty: aggravated – temporary hard labor for a period of not less than 5 years and a fine ranging from 5,000 to 15,000 dinars.
The Purpose: combating the spread of poison among members of society.

2. Simple Possession

The Act: laying hand on and controlling the substance without evidence of promotion or use.
The Penalty: lighter than promotion/trafficking, and depends on the circumstances of the seizure and the quantity of the substance.
The Purpose: criminalizing mere unlawful physical contact with the narcotic substance.

When Does Jordanian Law Consider a Drug User a Patient and Allow Exemption from Punishment?

A legal expert specialized in drug cases and state security at Abu Hadba Law Firm and Legal Consultations confirms that the Jordanian legislator has adopted a reformative approach that balances deterrence and treatment in specific cases:

Voluntary Request for Treatment: The user is exempted from punishment and prosecution if they present themselves, on their own initiative or through their family, to a licensed treatment center before being apprehended.
First-Time Use: It is not recorded as a criminal record in the judicial record, and the offender is given a chance to receive treatment and rehabilitation instead of imprisonment.
Admission to a Treatment Facility: The court has the right to replace the prison sentence with admission of the user to a specialized treatment facility until recovery, based on a medical committee's report.
Full Confidentiality: The law guarantees the confidentiality of the data of users undergoing treatment, to facilitate their reintegration into society.

Cassation Appeal Procedures Before the Court of Cassation in Narcotics Cases

The Court of Cassation in Jordan is considered the supreme judicial guarantee. A legal expert specialized in narcotics cases and state security at Abu Hadba Law Firm and Legal Consultations represents clients at this critical stage to seek the annulment of rulings issued by the State Security Court. The procedures are summarized as follows:

Right of Appeal: All rulings issued by the State Security Court in narcotics felonies are subject to appeal before the Court of Cassation, whether the ruling is a conviction or an acquittal.
Statutory Period: The cassation memorandum must be submitted within 30 days from the day following the date the ruling was issued if it was rendered in the presence of the parties, or from the date of notification if it was rendered in absentia.
Grounds for Appeal: The appeal focuses on specific legal aspects, such as violation of the law, error in its application or interpretation, nullity in trial procedures, or insufficiency of evidence.
Mandatory Cassation by Operation of Law: In cases where death sentences or life hard labor sentences are issued, the case is automatically referred to the Court of Cassation even if the convicted person does not file an appeal.
Nature of Review: The Court of Cassation is a court of law, not a court of fact—meaning it monitors the extent to which the State Security Court has correctly applied the provisions of Jordanian law, without re-hearing witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a criminal record created upon first-time use?

No, Jordanian law does not enter first-time use into the judicial record (criminal record) in order to give a chance for rehabilitation.

What is the period for appeal before the Court of Cassation?

The appeal must be submitted within 30 days from the date the ruling was issued in the presence of the parties, or from the date of notification for a ruling issued in absentia.

Can exemption from punishment be granted upon requesting treatment?

Yes, the user is fully exempted from prosecution if they voluntarily surrender to treatment centers before being apprehended.

Can a promotion/trafficking charge be reduced to a use charge?

Yes, this is possible if the defense proves the absence of intent to distribute and that the seized quantity was intended solely for personal use.

Which authority has jurisdiction to hear these cases?

The State Security Court is the authority with exclusive and specialized jurisdiction over narcotics cases in Jordan.

Resorting to a legal expert specialized in drug cases remains the optimal way to deal with the complexities of the competent courts in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, as expertise contributes to analyzing evidence and presenting sound legal defenses to protect individuals' legal future and ensure the application of legal provisions in the spirit of justice and fairness.

Learn more:The Accused's Right to Defense and Provisional Release in Narcotics Cases

Judicial Precedents in Narcotics Cases and Their Impact on Current Rulings

The Most Common Legal Mistakes Made by Defendants in Narcotics Cases

Words: 2

Characters: 14